The natural thing to do here is for people to compare the Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM with the f/1.8. After all the f/1.8 is cheaper and easier to find and does about the same, right? Well, maybe. The f/1.8 is a good beginners leans for 50mm photos. The 50mm lens is a good way to start as it has the same focal length as the human eye does. So the f/1.8 is a nice step up from the consumer lens that came with your camera. It is a great place to get one feet wet with getting better quality photos than your standard snap shots. So why might you want to spend more to get the f/1.4 when the f/1.8 is so good? Simply put because the f/1.4 is better. While the f/1.8 does well under certain conditions the f/1.4 will capture good images in a much wider range of conditions.
The f/1.4 is made well even though it is affordable. It should last you longer than the plastic construction of the f/1.8. This will also mean it will be worth more should you choose to sell it and upgrade again later. You can think of buying the f/1.4 as an investment. The solid construction will also feel much better in your hand. While some users have reported the front lens falling out of the f/1.8, my f/1.4 has needed no calibration or work done even at seventy thousand photos taken and counting. The only issue with the f/1.4 is the macro focus motor is not built as well as other USM lenses.
The f/1.4 is a very versatile lens. You can use your auto-focus and then make manual adjustments without switching anything. They consider this a full time manual focus. With the f/1.8 you need to flip a switch back and forth between the two types of focusing. The f/1.4 also has a better and more reliable focus than the f/1.8. The f/1.4 is much better in dim lighting conditions and is less noisy. The f/1.4 is resistant to barrel distortion and chromatic aberration. The f/1.4 is much less subject to problems such as lens flare than the f/1.8.
The f/1.4 will also get your truer color than the f/1.8 does. When images are taken at the widest apertures the f/1.4 out performs the f/1.8 and the images require post work much less frequently. You should easily be able to adjust setting for the sharpness or clarity by stopping down or not.
My 50mm f/1.4 has given me great images right from the start. They are decently sharper at f/1.4 and get sharper as you go past f/1.8. It does have some fuzzy edges around 1.4-1.6. If you do not get the sharpness you expect I would suggest either trading the lens or having it calibrated. The f/1.4 should perform well when calibrated correctly.
The f/1.4 is a serious lens for serious photography. It will get you sharper clearer images with better color and less distortion. The tight focal panel is great for getting a nice clear subject with a more fuzzy background for shots common to things like wedding photography or newspaper photos or people. Overall both lenses are good but the f/1.4 is much better and if you are ready to take a step up you will notice a much bigger difference in quality if you spend just a bit more and get the Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM lens.
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:49:53 +0000
Did your message disappear? Read the Forums FAQ.
Spam Control | * indicates required field
TrackBack only accepted from WebSite-X Suite web sites. Do not submit TrackBacks from other sites.
No TrackBacks yet. TrackBack can be used to link this thread to your weblog, or link your weblog to this thread. In addition, TrackBack can be used as a form of remote commenting. Rather than posting the comment directly on this thread, you can posts it on your own weblog. Then have your weblog sends a TrackBack ping to the TrackBack URL, so that your post would show up here.
Messages, files, and images copyright by respective owners.